The threat of the Memecoin Grift to Ethereum Culture.
The constant and cynical promotion of tokens without any value poses a serious threat to Ethereum’s reputation.
The memecoin culture is made up of the most obsessively influencer-driven people in the cryptocurrency industry, who are stuck in the Influencer Pit of Despair. This is a deep and dark hole where fraudulent influencers scramble over each other to rob the nearest unsuspecting retail investor. You can find the Influencer Pit in the form of a Twitter Space, but not just any Twitter Space. It’s more like experiencing a debilitating K-Hole in a Prague dive bar. And to top it off, you’ve lost your wallet.
It’s a fundamental paradox that since anyone can use the Ethereum blockchain, anyone can use the Ethereum blockchain. If Ethereum were a local park, the memecoiners would be an unruly gang of teenagers listening to music on some god-forsaken Bluetooth speakers.
Paul Dylan-Ennis is a blockchain columnist and lecturer in the College of Business, University College Dublin.
- Title Bitcoin Mining Firm Survives Crypto Winter Again.
- Centralized exchanges in the US doomed?
- Bitcoin is becoming the money of the future.
Imagine that you are working on Eigenlayer or zero-knowledge (ZK) proofs, or you are an Arbitrum delegate. And while you’re working diligently on something useful, you can’t help but grit your teeth when you hear that some brainless fool just made a cool million by tweeting.
Memecoins will always be a part of an open-source network like Ethereum, but for cryptocurrency to be widely adopted, the industry needs to find a way to collectively address its worst forms of valueless profit seeking.
There is something hopeless about how little value the memecoin grift provides.
When Pepe (PEPE) was created, the team openly admitted that the project was pure memeology, fueled by our favorite rehabilitated frog. At this point in the industry’s cycle, there’s something quite empty about returning to the meme well, eking out a living as bottom feeders on some anonymous team’s larp. It’s mindless algorithmic churn, like inventing the wheel but only using it to go in circles.
And those Spaces! My word. Memecoin Spaces seem to be required by law to have the most obnoxiously loud host, for no apparent reason. At least three of the speakers, sporting equally terrible NFT (non-fungible token) investments as their PFPs (profile pictures), will admit to several misdemeanors over the course of an hour. At least 75% of the audience has bought something from Supreme and made a loss on it.
Before you start feeling bad, let’s remember what the Influencer Pit does. It sucks in retail investors, selling them on the concept that financial nihilism is the truth. It contributes to the idea that blockchain (or crypto or Web3) is simply about speculation. It stipulates that your only option in life is to hustle fast enough and hope you don’t end up as fodder for a CoffeeZilla video.
The latest trend is painfully banal. It’s such a low-brow grift that I’m embarrassed to even write about it. Influencer grifters, often double-dipping from prior shilling of memecoins, will simply post an Ethereum address and ask people to send ether (ETH) to it. One can only hope the IRS does not ENS. The wink and nod in this scam is the explicit promise of no return. You would, and I mean this quite literally, be just as well setting fire to your physical wallet than sending a transaction like this.
In Ethereum there are no police. In a decentralized, permissionless culture there is nobody who can sanction you like the law might IRL
I’m not sure what the appropriate punishment should be for these crimes against humanity. First-time offenders might have to attend Bitcoin Miami wearing an Ethereum T-shirt. Serial offenders will need harsher punishments, perhaps trapped in a dark room with a Richard Heart monologue on repeat, for up to two years. We might instead decide to capture all the grifter influencers on an island somewhere. Perhaps we could create a fake conference, NFT Pitcairn Islands, and then create a decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) whose only purpose is to ensure no flight ever leaves, spending treasury funds on bribing the islanders to distract the influencers with shiny objects.
There is a significant issue within the Ethereum community. Influencer grifters are upfront about the fact that “you will get nothing” and that you should be happy with that. However, the underlying message is much darker: we can do nothing. This is the paradox of permissionlessness that is inherent in blockchain communities. Permissionlessness is a non-negotiable topic in Ethereum culture. Without permissionlessness, Ethereum would not exist at all.
Since technical solutions are not an option, we are left with social options. Imagine Ethereum as a cosmopolitan city. It has its Municipal Hall of developers, organizers, and researchers. It has its finance district with decentralized finance (DeFi). It has its bohemian quarter of NFTs. It has its Average Joes living on Main Street. But it also has its shady downtown where the grifters live.
Downtown is not as bad as Skid Row, where you’ll probably find people plotting to social engineer Bored Ape owners. Like any city, you can silo yourself in the safe areas and hope the police might deal with it. Except in Ethereum, there are no police. In a decentralized, permissionless culture, there is nobody who can sanction you like the law might in real life (of course, governments can outside of Ethereum).
This means that you have to create an atmosphere, a cultural context, where the message of long-term regen culture overshadows short-term degen culture, relegating it to an immature phase. The regens are those within Ethereum culture dedicated to ensuring that the technology does not generate negative externalities but instead positively impacts society over the long term. How do we, in the words of Gitcoin founder Kevin Owocki, funnel more Ethereans into regen than degen?
Here, I advocate for something a little unorthodox. I believe that Ethereum should introduce a Citizen’s Assembly. In my home country of Ireland, citizens are randomly selected to convene and discuss important issues relating to the Irish Constitution. In Ethereum, we don’t have a Constitution, but there could be value in an annual forum where various stakeholders in Ethereum meet to discuss important concerns.
See also: Paul Dylan-Ennis – Who Is Building Ethereum’s Public Goods? | Opinion
Similar to the open-source concept that many eyes can fix a problem quicker than a single pair can, the Ethereum Assembly could consider pressing issues (e.g., what to do about Lido, a decentralized service that is said to be dominating Ethereum staking) but also how to encourage people away from degen into regen with active efforts. Citizens from each stakeholder group, from validators to developers to application builders to Average Joes, could come together and hash it out.
And the most important effect? I believe it would encourage a sense of responsibility over the protocol across the community spectrum, introducing social matters as important as technical ones.
Or we could just keep sending the grifters ETH…
- Binance erred in delisting Monero, ZCash, and other privacy coins.
- Bitcoin offers hope for the future as we have failed Gen Z.
- Bitcoin’s Impact on Real Estate
- Apple and Goldman Sachs mistrust their new banking customers.
- NYT publish manipulated footage of a Bitcoin mine?
- PulseChain tent collapsing
- House Bill would limit SEC’s ability to classify crypto tokens as securities