Solana’s Parrot Protocol proposes to remove tokens, putting investors at risk of -89% returns.

Solana's Parrot Protocol proposes to remove tokens, putting investors at risk of -89% returns.

The Controversial Proposal by Parrot Protocol: A Deep Dive into the Blockchain Industry

The blockchain industry is no stranger to controversy and debates over governance and token economics. A recent proposal from Parrot Protocol’s team, a Solana-based liquidity network, has ignited a firestorm of discussion and tension among its community members. The proposal, currently up for vote until July 27, calls for the redemption of its PRT tokens for liquid treasury value and the transition to a no-token protocol.

The Proposal and its Implications

Based on the proposal, the PRT redemption price has been set at $0.0045 per token. This has significant implications for the investors involved since the protocol has raised over $89 million since its inception in 2021, with a current return on investment (ROI) of -89% for investors in its Initial DEX Offering (IDO) and initial exchange offering (IEO). A negative ROI indicates that investors have lost money on their investment, raising concerns and frustrations among the community.

The protocol’s plan, however, does not provide explicit reasons behind the move, simply stating that “many PRT holders would like to redeem their PRT tokens for their treasury value.” This lack of transparency has further fueled the controversy surrounding the proposal.

Token Distribution and Governance

One of the key points of contention raised by community members is the distribution and control of PRT tokens. Comments from the community suggest that 81% of tokens are controlled by the team, raising concerns about centralized control and decision-making power. In response, the Parrot team has refuted these claims, asserting on Twitter that treasury tokens are never touched or used for governance purposes.

To gain a better understanding of the token distribution, a breakdown provided by CryptoRank reveals that 35% of tokens were distributed as Protocol Incentives, 20% as Team & Angels, 10% as public sales, 20% as Seed rounds, and 15% as Others. This information provides valuable insights into the allocation of tokens and the stakeholders involved.

Unanswered Questions and Community Skepticism

The proposal leaves several questions unanswered, adding to the skepticism and unease within the community. One such question pertains to the fate of unclaimed funds after the 8-week redemption period. Community members have suggested that the funds could potentially be cashed out by insiders, further exacerbating concerns about fairness and equity.

Community members have expressed their opposition to the proposal, citing a perceived lack of transparency and accountability. One community member shared their frustration, stating, “The community has already explained in painstaking detail why we’re not interested in this. The pro-rata value is an extreme lowball and fails to account for many of the team’s misuses of the treasury without the community’s consent. The team also prematurely unlocked the team and VCs’ vesting tokens, so they are the majority token holders, making this vote meaningless and a total farce.”

The Larger Context of Governance and Tokenomics

The controversy surrounding Parrot Protocol’s proposal reflects a broader discussion within the blockchain industry regarding governance and tokenomics. As blockchain projects evolve, the distribution and control of tokens, as well as decision-making processes, become crucial considerations.

Transparency, accountability, and fair distribution of tokens are essential for building trust and maintaining a healthy ecosystem. Tokenomics, the economics of tokens within a blockchain project, play a significant role in determining the value and utility of tokens. Projects that fail to address these concerns risk alienating their community and undermining the long-term success of their protocol.


The recent proposal by Parrot Protocol has sparked intense debate within its community, highlighting the importance of transparent governance and fair tokenomics within the blockchain industry. The controversy surrounding the proposal serves as a reminder that blockchain projects must carefully consider the concerns and needs of their community to foster a healthy and sustainable ecosystem.

As the blockchain industry continues to evolve, it is essential for projects to prioritize transparency, accountability, and equitable token distribution. By addressing these issues, blockchain projects can cultivate trust and confidence within their community, paving the way for long-term success and growth in this rapidly expanding industry.

Image source: CryptoRank

We will continue to update Phone&Auto; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!


Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more


The CFTC Wants to Identify Individuals in DeFi: What You Need to Know

A recent report from one of the regulatory committees advises policymakers to prioritize digital identity projects an...


DEXTools Presents: Sh*tcoins Galore! 🚀

Discover Tuesday's top-performing coins as the blue-chip crypto market shows a mixed tone. Explore the exciting volat...


HashKey to offer BTC and Ether retail services in Hong Kong amidst intensifying battle for Asian market

HaskKey, the leading Asian digital asset exchange, is excited to announce that it has expanded its services to includ...


Watch Out, Bitcoin Traders! Bulls and Bears Battle for the Ultimate Breakout

Fashion watchers note that BTC's price is currently trading in a steady range and altcoins are following its lead.


Tether Keeps the Printing Press Rolling: 4 Billion USDT Tokens Minted in a Month!

Tether, the stablecoin issuer, has ramped up its production of USDT by issuing an additional 4 million over the past ...


Bitcoin Bulls on the Run: From Rags to Riches with a Spot ETF

The CEO of JAN3, Samson Mow, believes that if a spot Bitcoin ETF is approved, Bitcoin could reach $1 million in just ...