Musk’s lawyers dismiss motion to remove Tesla team from Dogecoin case as a waste of time.

Lawyers representing billionaire Elon Musk and Tesla have requested a United States district court judge to dismiss a motion that seeks to impose sanctions on them for alleged conflicts of interest in a $258 billion lawsuit. The lawsuit accuses Musk of participating in an illegal racketeering scheme related to the Dogecoin (DOGE) cryptocurrency.

Musk and Tesla’s legal team responded to the motion filed by Evan Spencer, the lawyer representing the plaintiffs in the case, on July 6.

In his motion, Spencer referred to the defendants’ lawyers as “yes men” and argued that it is a conflict of interest for them to represent both Musk and Tesla. He claimed that the lawyers’ loyalty lies solely with Musk.

Related: Elon Musk accuses Mark Zuckerberg of cheating: Twitter vs. Threads

In their response, Musk and Tesla’s legal team strongly criticized Spencer’s motion, calling it “unsubstantiated” and “frivolous” multiple times in the table of contents alone.

The defendants’ representatives argue that there is no conflict of interest under New York law. They assert that legal teams are allowed to represent both the officers of a company and the company itself, except in situations where the two entities are legal adversaries. According to their filing on July 6:

“Spencer’s Motion […] is an egregious abuse of process, yet another fanciful work of fiction by Spencer in a long chain of such pleadings, a waste of this Court’s time, and an insult to undersigned counsel, well-regarded members of the Bar of this Court and recently admitted by the Court pro hac vice.”

The filing also addresses Spencer’s allegations that Tesla’s legal team leaked a letter to the New York Post that criticized Spencer’s frivolous filings. The letter accused Spencer of using frivolous motions to delay court procedures.

Spencer’s motion to have the defense team sanctioned claims that this action has tainted the jury pool.

Musk and Tesla’s lawyers deny leaking the letter and counter that Spencer introduced the letter to the jury pool by publicly docketing and presenting it through the June 25 motion.

We will continue to update Phone&Auto; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

Market

Kelp DAO Introduces KEP Token, Making Ethereum Restaking More Liquid

Kelp DAO's latest development, the KEP token, is set to enhance liquidity for EigenLayer Points, providing valuable o...

BlockChain

Justin Sun's Huobi-linked exchange, WhiteBIT, raises concerns over its lending platform.

WhiteBIT, an exchange associated with Justin Sun, has recently gained attention for offering an impressive Annual Per...

BlockChain

Swell Introduces Layer-2 Restaking Rollup in Partnership with AltLayer and EigenLayer

Swell teamed up with Ethereum scaler AltLayer and a16z-backed crypto-staking project EigenLayer to create the rollup,...

Opinion

EigenLayer's Sreeram Kannan on Ethereum's risky 'restaking' trend

In an exciting interview, Sreeram Kannan, the visionary founder of EigenLayer and a trailblazer in the field of resta...

DeFi

🚀 Liquid Restaking Tokens: The Hype, The Risks, and The Future of Ethereum DeFi! 🌟

Discover the latest developments in the world of blockchain technology with our weekly newsletter. This week, join Sa...

BlockChain

EigenLayer Emerges as a DeFi Powerhouse with $4.3 Billion Inflows

The amount of capital invested in restaking protocols has skyrocketed to $10 billion, far surpassing its previous val...