Is it time to ‘X-it’ Twitter for threads?

Is it time to 'X-it' Twitter for threads?

The Blockchain Industry: Threads vs. Twitter Rebranding

The blockchain industry has been abuzz with the recent launch of Threads, a social media platform developed by Meta, the parent company of Instagram. Threads gained significant attention and quickly amassed over 100 million users within a week of its release. Initially, it seemed like Threads had the potential to challenge Twitter, which had just rebranded as X. However, the dynamics of the internet quickly changed, with Threads experiencing a substantial decline in user activity and average usage time.

As Threads’ momentum wanes, decentralized social media platforms have garnered renewed interest, particularly after Twitter’s surprise rebrand. Meta has promised that Threads will soon become decentralized and compatible with the decentralized social media protocol ActivityPub, allowing users to interact with other platforms like Mastodon and Bluesky. However, skepticism remains within the Web3 community, as Threads currently requires users to create accounts using their existing Instagram credentials, raising concerns about data privacy and lock-in effects.

Additionally, Threads users are unable to engage with the platform anonymously, as their accounts are linked to a Meta account requiring personal identification. Despite these limitations, many believe that the average social media user prioritizes accessibility over privacy and decentralization. Threads offers a user-friendly interface, simple features, and cross-posting capabilities with Instagram, making it appealing to a broader audience.

Decentralization purists may not appreciate Threads’ reliance on a centralized platform like Meta, but some argue that it could be a necessary step towards building a truly open Web3. In a decentralized future, users would be able to seamlessly move content and interact with peers across different apps built on the same standards. While alternative Twitter platforms like Lens Protocol or Bluesky may be favored by Web3-focused community builders, Threads has the potential to capture the average social media user who may not be interested in learning about underlying protocols.

The value proposition of Threads remains uncertain in the face of criticism. Twitter has long been a target for disruption due to its glitchy features and perceived tolerance of hate speech. Threads offered a friendlier alternative, attracting users looking for different types of conversations. However, some users feel that Threads lacks the sense of camaraderie present during Twitter’s early days. Critics argue that Threads commodifies social connection and fails to establish a distinct culture and purpose.

Meanwhile, Twitter’s rebranding to X has also received criticism for being ego-driven. These platform wars highlight the importance of cultivating independent relationships and not relying solely on centralized platforms. Members of the Web3 community approach Threads with a scientific and exploratory mindset, willing to consider all options without dependence on a single platform.

While Threads may replace Twitter for the general public, it is unlikely to supplant Crypto Twitter, a community that values decentralization and collaboration on open-source protocols. The allure of a glitch-free social media platform may come from developers working in stealth mode, rather than Meta. Ultimately, authentic relationships and meaningful connections will always remain the most interoperable form of communication.

In conclusion, Threads’ initial success and subsequent decline have highlighted the ongoing evolution of the blockchain industry. The desire for decentralized social media platforms within the Web3 community is evident, and while Threads shows promises, its centralized nature and limitations have raised concerns. The platform wars remind us of the importance of independent relationships and the potential for innovative developers to shape the future of social media. As the blockchain industry continues to advance, the quest for a user-owned internet remains a driving force behind the pursuit of truly decentralized and impactful social media platforms.

We will continue to update Phone&Auto; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!


Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more


How can AI and blockchain disrupt music?

In the latest Cointelegraph Report, we delve into the exciting potential of blockchain and AI to revolutionize the mu...


Uptober' Gearing Up Is This the Energetic Kick-Off for a Thrilling Crypto Bull Run?

FalconX's Vivek Chauhan and David Lawant suggest that the market may be entering a new phase due to heightened intere...


Fear Blackrock ETF?

Our Head of Research is examining the possible effects on financial exchanges if the Blackrock Bitcoin ETF is authori...


Google’s Seven Generative AI Products: Taking Cover or Unleashing a Storm?

AI litigation will not only influence legal guidelines but also set ethical standards for future AI systems.


The farce of OpenAI geniuses was destined to be unsolvable from the first day...

The OpenAI controversy continues, with multiple reversals causing people to criticize and comment on its drama.


The Revenge of Bitcoin: Why 2024 Will Be a Game-Changer for the World’s Oldest Cryptocurrency 🚀🔥

According to Thesis CEO Matt Luongo, ETFs have the potential to drive widespread adoption of cryptocurrency, but it i...