Curve founder seeks unconventional parties to save struggling DeFi loans.

Curve founder seeks unconventional parties to save struggling DeFi loans.

The Curious Case of Curve Finance Founder’s Debt: Unveiling the Liquidity Sources

The cryptocurrency world is no stranger to headlines that highlight the ups and downs of its participants. One recent story that has captured the attention of many is the situation involving Michael Egorov, the founder of Curve Finance. Egorov has found himself in a precarious position where he needs to offload some of his positions in the decentralized finance (DeFi) market to alleviate his mounting debt. However, there are those who have raised concerns about the sources of liquidity being used in this process.

According to Nansen research analyst Sandra Leow, Egorov sold approximately 50 million Curve DAO (CRV) tokens over the counter (OTC) at a below-market rate of $0.40 per token. The sale came with a vesting agreement of three to six months or the option to sell if prices reach $0.80. Leow went on to provide a list of the buyers who participated in these purchases, shedding light on their backgrounds and potential implications.

Among the notable purchasers was Justin Sun, the founder of Tron. Sun has recently faced legal action by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission, adding a layer of intrigue to his involvement in Egorov’s liquidity offloading. Additionally, tech entrepreneur Jeffrey Huang, also known as “MachiBigBrother,” who has been accused of embezzling millions of dollars, appears on the list of buyers. Defamation lawsuits have been initiated in response to these accusations, further deepening the complexity of Egorov’s dealings.

DWF Labs, an investment firm involved in market making, also took advantage of the discounted tokens. The involvement of Cream Finance, a DeFi lending protocol, raised eyebrows as well. Furthermore, there were mentions of “DCFGod,” a member of a nonfungible token (NFT) project, and several other crypto wallets in the list of buyers.

The situation surrounding Egorov’s liquidity offloading has not gone unnoticed, with Wintermute CEO Evgeny Gaevoy remarking that some of the individuals and entities he is dealing with “are kind of questionable.” The lack of Wintermute’s onboarding of Egorov as a counterparty adds an additional layer of skepticism.

It is crucial to understand the context behind Egorov’s need to offload his positions. He took out a substantial $100 million DeFi stablecoin loan using his CRV tokens as collateral. Unfortunately, the protocol was exploited on July 30, resulting in a 30% crash in CRV prices. This situation has raised concerns of a potential DeFi black swan event, as the flooding of the market with a significant amount of CRV tokens could lead to limited liquidity and sudden price fluctuations.

While the liquidation price for CRV, as indicated by DeFiLlama, is $0.362, recent repayments of debts have aided in the recovery of the token. Within the past 24 hours, the CRV token has rebounded and was trading at $0.597 at the time of writing.

According to Debank, Egorov has managed to repay more than $17 million in stablecoin loans, slightly improving the health of the loan. However, it is important to note that he still carries a considerable debt burden. He owes approximately $60 million in stablecoins on Aave, $12 million on Abracadabra, and around $8 million on Inverse. Furthermore, there is a loan of $9 million on Frax, with an interest rate of 85%, which has raised concerns among observers.

The complex web of Egorov’s debt situation has revealed the potential risks associated with liquidity offloading in the blockchain industry. It showcases the importance of closely examining the sources of liquidity, as well as the participants involved in such transactions. The transparency and integrity of these dealings play a vital role in maintaining confidence within the blockchain ecosystem.

In conclusion, the situation surrounding Michael Egorov and his attempts to alleviate his debt through the offloading of his DeFi positions has shed light on the challenges and intricacies of the blockchain industry. It serves as a reminder that diligence and caution are necessary when navigating within this evolving landscape. By understanding the sources of liquidity and closely assessing the individuals and entities involved, we can strive for a more secure and sustainable future for blockchain technology and its participants.

Related: Ethical hacker retrieves $5.4M for Curve Finance amid exploit

We will continue to update Phone&Auto; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!

Share:

Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more

DeFi

Web3's indifference to Bitcoin prices and other thoughts from Korea Blockchain Week

An enthusiastic crowd and encouraging applause from approximately 10,000 attendees at the numerous Web3 panels could ...

DeFi

Magnate Finance rug-pulls users of $6.5M, as predicted by on-chain sleuth.

The individual responsible for the rugpull has successfully transferred the majority of the profits to popular Ethere...

DeFi

South Korea's crypto ecosystem recovers from Terra setback, with gaming leading web3 activity.

Korean banks are eagerly exploring opportunities in the market, while gaming firms are actively seizing the potential...

DeFi

Struct Finance launches customizable interest rate product for DeFi users.

The product will enable traders to invest with either a low or high appetite for risk.

DeFi

Liquidity Manager App Concentric Exploited on Arbitrum: Users Urged to Take Action

CertiK has determined that the attacking wallet is possibly connected to the OKX DEX exploit which occurred in Decemb...

DeFi

🏦 DeFi Protocols Proposed to be Designated as Critical Infrastructure in the US

The Polygon legal team has published a cutting-edge paper that suggests personalized regulatory measures for DeFi pro...