BitMEX CEO proposes removal of internal market makers in crypto exchanges.

The CEO of BitMEX, Stephan Lutz, has stated that cryptocurrency exchanges do not need to have internal market makers, after it was revealed that has an internal trading team that trades cryptocurrencies.

There are concerns about a potential conflict of interest at, but in an interview with The Block, Lutz opposed the idea of internal market-making teams. He said that exchanges that make money from proprietary trading should have let go of their internal market-making teams by now.’s Internal Trading Team Raises Concerns

A Financial Times report revealed that the Singapore subsidiary of runs an internal proprietary trading and market-making team that trades cryptocurrency on behalf of the exchange. justified the team’s actions, saying that they treated it the same way as any other third party. The team exists to facilitate tight spreads and efficient markets on its platform, the exchange added. A spokesperson from said that the trading team ensures that the exchange remains risk neutral by hedging these positions on a number of venues, including the exchange. does not rely on such internal trading as a source of revenue, the spokesperson added.

However, Lutz opined that there are enough HFTs (High Frequency Traders) and prop shops that can perform the function of proprietary trading and market maker teams.

BitMEX faced similar allegations of running an internal trading team to make profits years ago, but Lutz clarified that the separate legal entity named Arrakis Capita now serves a very limited role for BitMEX. Arrakis, which used to serve as an internal market maker for BitMEX, is now “technologically” and “organizationally” separated from the derivatives exchange, according to the CEO.

Fall of FTX Puts Exchanges With Trading Teams Under Spotlight

BitMEX CEO said that the infamous fall of FTX exchange has brought more scrutiny on exchanges that have an internal trading team. FTX allegedly used its trading arm Alameda Research, which allegedly operated as a hedge fund, to bet FTX’s customers’ funds in order to make profits.

However, Lutz said that there are ways to identify which exchange is using a trading arm that risks investors’ funds or which is using it just as a treasury. One of the factors that separate Alameda-like companies from standard internal trading teams is the fee structure, Lutz said. Crypto exchanges that charge no transaction fees could also be seen as a red flag, indicating that they exist to attract trading flow for a market maker.

We will continue to update Phone&Auto; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!


Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more


Bitcoin Takes a Dive: What’s Behind the Price Drop?

The recent movement in Bitcoin price can be attributed to a combination of factors, such as significant liquidations,...


SBF Conviction Not a Failure of Cryptocurrency, But Proof of Traditional Establishment's Corruption

SBF's fraudulent behavior was exposed by encrypted Twitter, forcing government agencies to take action and ultimately...


Binance is the first fully-licensed crypto exchange in El Salvador.

Binance proudly announces its achievement as the inaugural fully-licensed cryptocurrency exchange in El Salvador, the...


Craig Wright Denied Permission to Appeal Ruling Against Peter McCormack

In July, a panel of judges decided that Wright was awarded a compensation of only 1 GBP for his libel claim against b...


Aptos Labs uses Microsoft's AI infrastructure to speed up Web3 adoption.

Aptos Labs and Microsoft have excitingly announced a groundbreaking partnership that aims to empower developers to ef...


Bitcoin bulls aim for $28K, await a 'big' buyer

Bitcoin aims to solidify $28,000 as a support level for the weekly close with the potential assistance of a substanti...