Bitcoiners must do more to prevent CBDCs from winning.

Bitcoiners must do more to prevent CBDCs from winning.

The Battle for Hearts and Minds: The Ideological War of the Blockchain Industry

By Logan Chipkin, a professional writer and blockchain enthusiast

In Saifedean Ammous’s book “The Fiat Standard,” he sheds light on how governments and quasi-private entities can manipulate public perception and influence consumer choices. Ammous specifically refers to the food industry and the impact of dietary guidelines formulated by organizations like the American Dietetics Association (ADA). He argues that these guidelines have shaped the understanding of nutrition among nutritionists and doctors, leading to misconceptions about the harms of animal fat and the benefits of grains.

This example serves as a cautionary tale for those involved in the blockchain industry. Like the food industry, even if a product or technology is superior, governments and other entities have the power to spread narratives that persuade people to choose an inferior alternative. If this can happen with food, it could very well happen with money.

A CBDC Punch-Counterpunch

On July 10, 2023, Reuters published an article by Karin Strohecker titled “Twenty-Four Central Banks Will Have Digital Currencies By 2030, Survey Shows.” According to the article, a significant number of central banks have been making progress in developing central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) for retail use. The motivation behind these developments is to retain control over digital payments, preventing the private sector from dominating this space amid the declining use of physical cash.

The concept of CBDCs as an alternative to cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin has been brewing for some time. In a report released in August 2022, the European Central Bank (ECB) discussed the merits and demerits of various cross-border payment solutions. While the report dismissed Bitcoin as the least credible option, it highlighted the compatibility of domestic instant payment systems and future CBDCs as viable solutions.

In response to the ECB report, River Financial presented its own report, addressing the flaws in the argument for CBDCs and the obstacles Bitcoin must overcome for global adoption. The battle between CBDCs and cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin is not just about technological superiority. Central banks are leveraging marketing techniques, propaganda, and persuasive narratives to promote CBDCs as the superior alternative.

Understanding The Education Process

While those in the blockchain industry understand the shortcomings of fiat currencies and the benefits of decentralized solutions like Bitcoin, it is crucial to recognize that this knowledge is not widespread. The battle for the future of money extends beyond product superiority; it is an ideological war fought in the realm of hearts and minds.

Sam Wouters, in his report as part of River Financial, emphasizes the need for Bitcoin proponents to understand the education process thoroughly. Many Bitcoin enthusiasts may overlook the difficulties the average person faces when trying to grasp complex concepts related to monetary economics and the flaws of fiat money. Educating the masses requires bridging the gap between the industry’s knowledge and the recipient’s understanding.

Technical and quantitative arguments alone are not enough to sway public opinion. People’s ideas about money and ideologies play a significant role in their decision-making process. Even if Bitcoin were as user-friendly as traditional payment methods, individuals could still reject it due to deeply ingrained ideological beliefs. The battle between grain (CBDCs) and meat (Bitcoin) can be won or lost based on the prevailing ideologies.

While the educational effort required to promote decentralized cryptocurrencies is colossal, it is crucial in the face of propaganda from central banks. The blockchain industry must embark on a persuasive journey, enlightening billions of people about the profound impact of decentralized technology and the dangers of CBDCs. This ideological war will determine the fate of money and the future of financial systems.

In conclusion, the blockchain industry’s battle for hearts and minds mirrors the tactics employed in the food industry. Governments and powerful entities can influence public opinion and consumer choices, promoting inferior alternatives over superior solutions. The advent of CBDCs presents a significant challenge to the adoption of decentralized cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. To win this battle, the industry must focus on educating the masses, highlighting the flaws of fiat money, the dangers of CBDCs, and the transformative power of decentralized solutions. Victory is possible, but it requires a robust persuasive effort to overcome the propaganda of the opposing ideologies.

We will continue to update Phone&Auto; if you have any questions or suggestions, please contact us!


Was this article helpful?

93 out of 132 found this helpful

Discover more


FedNow's Impact on Your Financial Freedom What You Absolutely Must Know!

Fashionista The Federal Reserve is facing backlash for its FedNow service, exposing tensions between centralization a...


IRS Proposed Rule Could Kill Crypto in America

This proposal highlights the potential challenges for decentralized finance in the U.S. and serves as an insightful l...


Fear Blackrock ETF?

Our Head of Research is examining the possible effects on financial exchanges if the Blackrock Bitcoin ETF is authori...


PayPal's Stablecoin Issues

In order for PYUSD to achieve significant and sustainable growth, it is crucial for the newly established stablecoin ...


Crypto’s Tumultuous Love Affair with the U.S. Government: A Rollercoaster Ride to Regulations

Fashionista readers hoping for a solid regulatory regime for crypto in the United States may have to wait until 2025 ...


"Is Michael Lewis sacrificing his reputation to support Sam Bankman-Fried?"

The acclaimed financial writer's latest book, Going Infinite, offers a compelling perspective on the rise and fall of...